THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2011
Health insurers will have to start publicly justifying big rate hikes, according to a new requirement of the healthcare law implemented Thursday to get insurance companies to hold down skyrocketing premiums.
The new rules will mandate that insurers post explanations of premium increases exceeding 10% on their websites and submit them to state and federal regulators, who will also post them, starting later this year.
“For far too long, families and small employers have been at the mercy of insurance rate increases that often put coverage out of their reach,” Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement. “Rate review will shed a bright light on the industry’s behavior and drive market competition to lower costs.”
The new rules do not give state and federal regulators new authority to block rate hikes, however, even if government officials find the increases are unjustified.
Some states already have this power, and several particularly aggressive states, such as Oregon and Rhode Island, routinely make insurers lower their rate increases after determining proposed rate hikes are unjustified.
At the same time, state regulators have been beefing up oversight of insurance companies with the help of federal grant money made available by the healthcare law President Obama signed last year.
But to the chagrin of consumer advocates, 30 states still do not have authority to block rate hikes in the individual and small-group markets, according to a 2010 survey by the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation.
“Disclosure alone will never be enough to prevent health insurers from charging unreasonable insurance premiums. To protect consumers, regulators must have the power to review and reject excessive rates,” said Carmen Balber, Washington director for California-based Consumer Watchdog.
The insurance industry, long a powerhouse in state capitols nationwide, has vigorously fought efforts to give regulators this enhanced authority, saying it is unnecessary.
This week , an effort in California to give the state’s insurance commissioner greater authority collapsed in the statehouse.
Thursday, America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry’s Washington-based lobbying arm, reiterated it opposition to enhanced oversight, suggesting that premium hikes are “a reflection of the underlying cost of medical care in a local market.”
The Obama administration plans to rely on state insurance regulators to scrutinize insurance rates.
But federal regulators will conduct insurance oversight in several states where the administration has determined that state oversight is inadequate.
In the future, the Obama administration plans to work with states to set individual state-by-state threshholds for rate hikes that will require public explanation from insurance companies.
www.reliableins.net
No Comments
Post a Comment |
Required
|
|
Required (Not Displayed)
|
|
Required
|
All comments are moderated and stripped of HTML.
|
|
|
|
|
NOTICE: This blog and website are made available by the publisher for educational and informational purposes only.
It is not be used as a substitute for competent insurance, legal, or tax advice from a licensed professional
in your state. By using this blog site you understand that there is no broker client relationship between
you and the blog and website publisher.
|
Blog Archive
2020
2019
2018
2017
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
|